Saturday, August 22, 2026

Demand = Death

As the world burns under deadly heat waves, fires and drought, Big Tech Capital and their government enablers have decided to add more fuel to the fire.From the Financial Times: "An FT analysis of 60 of the largest planned data centres being built in the US by Amazon, Microsoft, Google and Meta found that they could together produce 101.5mn tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions a year once fully operational, based on the most recent snapshot of US power generation. That would be equivalent to about 7 per cent of US power-sector emissions in 2025 — the annual emissions of 27 coal plants or 24mn petrol-powered cars." Most of these emissions are new gas fired generators but there are also those aging coal plants that were slated to be de-comissioned but are now being extended. All this for a technology which will provide...certain benefits? some advantages? a better life? None of that is clear. We do know it is propping up the U.S. economy. Then there is insurance, where governments are becoming the insurer of last resort. "Climate impacts are no longer a marginal or far-future risk, but a structural macro-fiscal problem today. They will rapidly get more expensive in Europe because it is the world’s fastest-warming continent (EEA, 2024)." For some reason the movement against data centers prefers not to focus on climate impacts. They generally focus on water issues or noise or electricity bills going up. In fact conservative environmentalists urge capaigners not to use the word climate, that it triggers people who might otherwise support some policy. This is exactly why activists must use the climate argument continuously. Over and over and over. But the argument has to include capitalism as a failed system.

1 comment:

  1. The new moral panic of early September. AI (and so many other energy hogs) are essentially going kill us all but not in the Terminator way they imagine. How is a dead planet not the prime concern? ....
    "27-year-old Anthropic and OpenAI researcher Jacob Coxon announced on X that he had resigned. The companies, he wrote, “are racing straight to self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives. . . . The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade.”

    By Wednesday night, the post had been viewed more than 125 million times, and counting. It also set off a wave of responses from AI researchers, including Anthropic Alignment Science Lead Evan Hubinger, who wrote: “[W]e really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! I personally think it is >10% within the next decade.”".

    ReplyDelete