"Racial Capitalism"

Reading an online mag called The Forge I keep running into this term "racial capitalism" and references to "the uprising". What I am hoping, seriously hoping, is that these folks can do some comparative analysis with Occupy Wall Street, so as to avoid similar pitfalls. The other thing that jumps out at me (old white man me) is the call to "center Black leadership" in the movement and here I am reminded of Standing Rock and the calls to "center indigenous leadership". The other problematic similar to Standing Rock is the rejection of "isms". Fortunately no one reads this blog or cares what I think, so my critique won't induce attacks, but this is a good-faith effort: the uprising, standing rock and occupy need to be looked at in their historical context, both in terms of similarities and differences. These events, along with the anti-Iraq war movement, define the popular protest of a generation and from my perspective, it's not a pretty picture. One of the key frictions in all three events has involved the definition and parsing of the term capitalism and the purposeful avoidance of class analysis (whether one accepts or rejects it). I truly hope "racial capitalism" is not that. I truly hope Black academics do not resort too quickly to the term "class reduction" as they theorize the conjunction of crises that is upon us. Policing (especially racist policing) and gun violence are symptoms, and unless you are willing to talk about "isms", you will not get to the root, the disease, the terrifying trauma. As for "centering", let's also remember that the trauma can affect leadership, that leading has its own set of problems and inclusion and intersectionality have to work both ways. Ecology might not be the first thing you think about waking up in the inner city but it is no less Real. Out here where I live there are wide-open spaces but no Black folk to speak of and the cops deal with meth addicts and wife beaters and teen suicides and all kinds of well-armed humans damaged by plain old capitalism. Not to mention criminals. Abolishing them requires fixing the world first and I'd like to collaborate on that project, not follow. Finlly, The Loud Right-Wing Media is calling BLM "Marxist" in the hopes of driving a wedge and I hope the movement doesn't go all liberal and fall for the trap. What would Fred Hampton do? He'd preach a little Marx- ism.

Non-reformist Reforms

One has to ask: where does all that anger and energy go? I keep reading about how the George Floyd Rebellion was this historical moment but is that all that gets generated anymore? Moments? Can nothing be sustained? It was obvious that "Abolish the Police" was a non-starter but given the rise in urban violence/ violent crime, even the innocuous "police reform" has not only vanished from the agenda, but has come back to mock and be used as a cudgel for the Law and Order Right. The other day I passed a highway stand selling Thin Blue Line flags, bumper-stickers and other right-wing paraphanalia. The booth was manned by a black man. The DSA went all-in for the PRO Act, hoping to build labor support for the Green New Deal and clean energy infrastructure. But after the Amazon union campaign was crushed, not a word about the legislation. It went to that place where hopes in the Democrats always go to die. Right next to Medicare for All and Bernie or Bust or Carbon Tax and Dividend. But even if these reform efforts were successful, wouldn't htey just demonstrate that liberal "democratic" capitalism is a flexible, moderate system, one that can be made kinder, gentler and greener with citizen participation? And therefor given more legitimacy?

"Caressing the sharks teeth"

A Brazillian priest named Frei Betto coined a brilliant term to describe the attempt to work out an accomodation with a predator: caressing the sharks teeth. This describes perfectly the approach of those hoping to create a kinder, gentler, greener capitalism- who truly believe the shark can be lulled into docility with niceness. These people believe that one way to pacify the shark is to offer up sacrificial victims, hoping it will stay occupied. This demonstrates a lack of knowledge regarding shark behavior. Sharks can be nice until they're not, until the frenzy begins. Then it doesn't care who has been caressing what. Back in 2010 I finished a novel that was set in Israel/ Palestine. It explored the issues around illegal settlement building and the Al Aqsa mosque and the conditions on the West Bank and Gaza. It is now ten years later and incredibly, nothing has changed. Protests turn violent, rockets get fired, missles come back in retaliation. Repeat. It is a horrific Ground Hog day performance that borders on the absurd, the banal, in its total lack of creativity.

Because Democrats

Sometimes you get educated in the wierdest places. Today for instance, I'm at the lumber yard stunned by the insane jump in prices and the guy loading my two-by-sixes explained that it is because of the Democrats. Seeing my raised eyebrows he explains: because they are giving away so much unemployment cash no one wants to work- hence the crazy inflated prices in wood products. This is certainly not the first time I have heard this crazy right-wing meme offered up by average working stiffs. What is remarkable to me is the fact that this lumber-yard worker has politics at all- and that he is so willing to share them with a total stranger. I lacked the inspiration to defend Democrats or try to present a nuanced case for supporting workers during a pandemic. This exchange exemplifies the problem with expecting "progressive policies" to re-build the workers movement. Many are motivated by resentment toward anyone, no matter how deserving, gaining an advantage over them through government policy. Why the culture war is so effective. More nervousness around climate policy as Wyoming gets ready to sue states that ban fossil fuels. They have enjoyed an incredible boom through extraction and see the writing on the wall. Montana's legislature is also prepared to fight for fossil fuels till the last glacier is melted. Truly a fight to the death.

Boomtown Redux

The NPR commentary bordered on ecstatic as they reported on the level of economic growth (measured in GDP) the US is currently experiencing and the projections for its continuation. Highest numbers since 1984.In his speech to Congress, Biden crowed about the surge and framed it as an existential race with China, a match between the inscrutable commies and American know-how. The man knows how to fire up re-blooded Americans, no doubt, but not one word about emissions. And Americans can always be counted on to spend and consume, with no thought of emissions. It is how we have been programmed. In my distant youth, my mission in life was to flee growth and development, to escape from the San Francisco Bay Area and find refuge in the great Northwest. I had witnessed environmental destruction on a scale that would be hard to describe and I thought I could settle in a place far enough removed that the Promethian forces could be kept at bay. Alas. The little mountain valley I escaped to is now being over-run by the wealth that was made through that destruction. The all-white, conservative lovers of capitalism are flocking to the "great readout", buying up land, building huge rachettes, buying brand new mega-trucks with the stimulus they got from the government they hate. So they can carry hay bales for their thoroughbred horses. If you think you are going to make a left turn onto the highway at 5:00 you can forget about it. I have seen this movie and it's not pretty...but I'm too old to move again.

More Worries

Pretty good prediction in my Apr.13 post that "big insurance"is getting the jitters. From NYTImes: "Swiss Re also modeled the economic impacts of a 3.2-degree increase by 2050, which it described as the “severe case” for temperature gains. If that happened, levels of wealth in Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand would drop almost by half compared with a world with no climate change. The economy of Indonesia would be 40 percent smaller. India’s would be 35 percent smaller. The growing financial exposure of insurance companies to climate change is already having an effect on places at high risk. The United States government implemented a new pricing structure this month for flood insurance, which will mean higher costs for the most flood-prone homes. In California, homeowners in areas that are especially exposed to wildfires increasingly struggle to get insurance, prompting efforts by state officials to intervene. The Biden administration is expected to issue an executive order directing insurance regulators to assess the climate-related risks facing insurance companies." From the NYTimes April 20: — Under growing pressure from investors to address climate change, Exxon Mobil on Monday proposed a $100 billion project to capture the carbon emissions of big industrial plants in the Houston area and bury them deep beneath the Gulf of Mexico. Exxon, the largest U.S. oil company, wants to create a profit-making business out of the capture of carbon emitted by petrochemical plants and other industries. But its plan would require significant government support and intervention, including the introduction of a price or tax on carbon dioxide emissions, an idea that has failed to attract enough support in Congress in the past. These are contraditions that can only grow stronger and each week we will see the scramble for position get more and more frantic. The words "stranded assets" haven't cropped up yet but write-downs are inevitable as is a slump in the stock market. Then it gets interesting.

Boom Town

Capitalist logic insists the solution to every problem is more growth. All economic indicators point to a huge post-pandemic surge and of course that's what all the Biden stimulus is about. Locally, folks are definitely spending like there's no tomorrow- and if the economy booms there literally won't be. Everyone, including ecosocialists, are celebrating the "millions of new jobs" that go along with high growth and of course the Democrats will have lots to crow about when people have lots of disposable income to throw around. Entertainment, vacations, a new pick-up truck perhaps? All of which creates emissions. Despite Obama's assurance that "growth and emissions can be de-coupled.They can't. And that's the contradiction we are living and must heighten, though you won't win popularity contests. Which brings me to DSA and the big push to pass the PRO Act. I am worried that these young, mostly white, educated socialists are conflating the BLM uprising with a newly energized working class, of which I see little evidence. Apples and oranges. And my worry is that this young cadre doesn't know the dampening effect a loss (or string of losses) has on movement building capacity. The Amazon union campaign is a case in point, as was the Bernie campaign. Back to the local scene, the DSA chapter wants to support workers who were fired at the airport for walking out. But we already have a dozen under-staffed campaigns in the works, the workers are totally unorganized and a legal battle for re-instatement is pissing in the wind. Which brings me to my last complaint: our local 350 branch insists on arguing that we should abandon fossil fuels "because renewables are cheaper". And so they continue to reinforce capitalist/market logic despite the fact it is totally irrational. "Cheaper" by whose accounting? But they believe deeply that this argument and this logic is the only way to appeal to "the masses". Despite over a decade of watching emissions rise as a sclerotic movement flounders around Green Capitalism.